Summary

The axes that the Journal Club of Computer Engineering follows in the arXiv, with direct link to the list of most recent articles of each category. This is where the reading suggestions for the week come out.

Each category below leads to the listing /recent of the arXiv — the articles submitted in the last days, always updated in the source. There is no copy of this list here: arXiv is the source, and it changes every working day (weekend has no new submission).

<a class=“jc-button” href=“mailto:engcompbji@googleggroups.com?subject=Sugest%C3%A3%20%20by%20article%20%E2%80%94%20Journal%20Club%20ENGCOMP&body=T%C3%ADtulum%3A%0%0ALink%20%20arXiv%3A%0%0AT%C3%C3peak%20%28ex.%3A%20cs.SE%29%3A%0%0A%0A%20val%20discuss%20%28two%20%20%C3%A%20line%29%3A%0A%0A

🔒 Security

  • cs.CR — Cryptography and Security— encryption, protocols, vulnerabilities, privacy, security of systems and networks. It is the closest category to what is seen in information security disciplines.

🧱 Software and Language Engineering

  • cs.SE — Software Engineering— testing, maintenance, technical debt, repository mining, empirical studies with developers. Much article here is readable without heavy math — good starting point for those who have never read paper.
  • cs.PL — Programming Languages— semantics, type systems, compilers, verification. More formal than cs.SE, and the natural complement of Compiler discipline.

🧮 Algorithms and Theory

🤖 Artificial Intelligence

🖧 Systems and Networks

🔌 Hardware and Signals

Do you want to follow without visiting the site?

ArXiv publishes a feed by category: https://rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.SE (change category). You can sign on an RSS reader and receive the new titles every day. The feed is empty on weekends and holidays, when the arXiv does not announce submissions.

How to choose an article to present

Three criteria that avoid most problems:

  1. *Head in a week. If you can’t read and understand enough to explain in 20 minutes, it’s an article for another time. 60-page preprint with 30 appendix rarely works.
  2. *The method is reproducible or at least verifiable. ** Article describing what you did in such a way that you can question yields discussion; article that only announces result, no.
  3. Interests more than one person. The point is the conversation after the presentation. A hyperspecific article from your monograph is great for you and warm for the group.

It doesn’t have to be an article of the week. Classic of the area, an article you did not understand and want help to untangle, or paper that supports your TCC — everything goes, as long as it fits the three criteria.


🔗 References and correlations

Automatic translation notice

This page was automatically translated from Portuguese using the LibreTranslate-based automated translator implemented in tools/translate_quartz.py (it preserves wikilinks, embeds and proper names via positional splitting). Machine translation may contain inaccuracies — the original Portuguese version is the authoritative source.



© 2026 Pedro Henrique Rocha de Andrade · Built with Quartz